As of Beijing time The data is from a third-party organization and is only for reference.
For actual information, please refer to:www.eastmoney.com
Address: 20 Maguire Road, Suite 103, Lexington, MA 02421(America)
Tel: +1(626)986-9880
Address: Allia Future Business Centre Kings Hedges Road Cambridge CB4 2HY, UK
Tel: 0044 7790 816 954
Email: marketing@medicilon.com
Address: No.585 Chuanda Road, Pudong New Area, Shanghai (Headquarters)
Postcode: 201299
Tel: +86 (21) 5859-1500 (main line)
Fax: +86 (21) 5859-6369
© 2023 Shanghai Medicilon Inc. All rights reserved Shanghai ICP No.10216606-3
Shanghai Public Network Security File No. 31011502018888 | Website Map
Business Inquiry
Global:
Email:marketing@medicilon.com
+1(626)986-9880(U.S.)
0044 7790 816 954 (Europe)
China:
Email: marketing@medicilon.com.cn
Tel: +86 (21) 5859-1500
The war over the benefits and negative effects of artificial sweeteners continues to rage on as researchers from Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine (CWRUSM) have found that the artificial sweetener sucralose (Splenda) worsened gut inflammation in mice with the Crohn’s-like disease but had no substantive effect on those without the condition.
Findings from the new study – published recently in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in an article entitled “The Artificial Sweetener Splenda Promotes Gut Proteobacteria, Dysbiosis, and Myeloperoxidase Reactivity in Crohn’s Disease-Like Ileitis” – revealed increases in the numbers of Proteobacteria, a large phylum of microbes, in the intestines of mice drinking water supplemented with Splenda.
“Our findings suggest that patients with Crohn’s disease should think carefully about consuming Splenda or similar products containing sucralose and maltodextrin,” explained lead study investigator, Alex Rodriguez-Palacios, D.V.M., Ph.D., assistant professor of medicine at CWRUSM. “Several studies have examined the ingredients found in this widely available product, separately. Here, we used Splenda as a means to test the combined effect of the commercial ingredients and used one of the best animal models of ileal Crohn’s disease.”
Half of the mice studied belonged to a genetic line that suffers a form of Crohn’s disease and were more affected than the remaining half of mice, which belonged to a healthy mouse line. Splenda produced an intestinal overgrowth of Escherichia coli (a member of the Proteobacteria group) and increased bacterial penetration into the gut wall, but only in Crohn’s disease–like mice.
Moreover, the research team also found that Splenda ingestion resulted in increased myeloperoxidase activity in the intestines of mice with the bowel disease, but not in the healthy mice. Myeloperoxidase is an enzyme in leukocytes that is effective in killing various microorganisms. The inference is that the increased presence of E. coli intensified the myeloperoxidase activity in the bowel as the body sought to fight off the invader.
The findings suggest that consumption of Splenda may increase myeloperoxidase production only in individuals with a proinflammatory predisposition, such as Crohn’s disease or other forms of inflammatory bowel disease patients. As part of this process, inflammation and its attendant consequences could exacerbate the symptoms of Crohn’s disease.
“This study demonstrates that the sweetener induces changes in gut bacteria and gut wall immune cell reactivity, which could result in inflammation or disease flare-ups in susceptible people,” Dr. Rodriguez-Palacios noted. “On the other hand, the study suggests that individuals free of intestinal diseases may not need to be overly concerned.”
Splenda – introduced in 1998 – includes a thought-to-be indigestible artificial sweetener called sucralose and a digestible sweetener called maltodextrin. It is about 600 times as sweet as sugar and has become one of the most popular artificial sweeteners on the market.
“This is perhaps the closest we can get to provide experimental evidence that these ingredients together induce biological changes known to cause inflammation that could be harmful over time to susceptible animal subjects,” Dr. Rodriguez-Palacios remarked. “Our next step would be to run experiments directly in patients, but that is more difficult to conduct given the large variability that is inherent to human genetics, microbiome, and diet.”
Proteobacteria include a wide variety of pathogens, such as E. coli, Salmonella, and Legionellales (which causes Legionnaires’ disease.) A certain amount of these bacteria are normal in the body, and not harmful. Overgrowth, or excessive amounts, contributes to many health problems. Proteobacteria have previously been linked with various intestinal-tract diseases in several species, including humans.
Most Proteobacteria have an outer membrane composed of lipopolysaccharides, which when present in the body generally trigger powerful immune responses, including inflammation – the normal response of the body’s immune system to injuries and invading organisms. During the process of combating the antigen, symptoms such as pain, warmth, swelling, and redness can occur. If the invader, such as E. coli, is successfully repelled, the symptoms dissipate. But if the invader is not eradicated from the body, chronic inflammation may develop, or persist, as it is the case in inflammatory bowel diseases.
“Our findings were due solely to the administration of a minor component of the diet,” commented senior study investigator Fabio Cominelli, M.D., Ph.D., professor of medicine, at CWRUSM and chief of gastroenterology at UH Cleveland Medical Center. “This suggests that other dietary habits or additives may lead to similar microbiota alterations. For instance, diet emulsifiers used as food additives have also been shown recently to alter the gut microbiota and promote colitis in mice. Other scenarios could put Crohn’s disease patients at risk of having exaggerated inflammation as well. This could include unexpected foodborne bacterial infections that would further recruit myeloperoxidase-containing leukocytes to the intestinal tract and the resultant inflammation.”
Interestingly, in addition to illustrating the experimental role of a sucralose/maltodextrin–based artificial sweetener in promoting intestinal dysbiosis and myeloperoxidase activity, the studies indicate that it might be possible to measure Proteobacteria and myeloperoxidase as simultaneous fecal biomarkers in patients to monitor their gut health.